Man Fired After Telling Boss His Girlfriend Is Pregnant

One man recorded a video of him getting terminated from his process only a week after telling his boss that he and his girlfriend were expecting.

Getting laid off is one thing, but getting laid off mere days after you just knowledgeable your boss of a significant lifestyles alternate seems just a bit suspicious, does it not? That's what came about to at least one man, and TikTok concurs with him that this is not only a accident. Sadly, it kind of feels that his company gave the impression to want to do away with him stat after the news he shared with them.

Keep scrolling for his story.

Article continues below commercial

A man says he got fired after telling his boss that his girlfriend used to be pregnant.

A TikTok consumer named Tommy posted a video of him allegedly getting fired after telling his boss that his girlfriend used to be pregnant the week prior.

"We're here to talk about something completely unrelated to what you brought up to me last week," said his boss all over a Zoom name with him and an HR consultant that he recorded.

She continues, "That said, the team has undergone a restructuring, and unfortunately, your role has been eliminated, and that is effective today."

Article continues beneath commercial

She then says she will go away the decision and let the HR consultant speak about offboarding with him. She does not appear to thank him for his contributions to the corporate.

After she leaves the decision, Tommy asks the HR representative, "I got fired?"

Although it kind of feels like Tommy was once simply laid off, she replies: "Yes," including, "The role was terminated."

When Tommy asks if this decision was once based on efficiency, she responds no and says it was once in line with "the overall structure of the team."

Article continues under advertisement

When Tommy explains to her that he simply shared the news of his girlfriend's being pregnant with his boss, she is of the same opinion with him that it is unfortunate timing, however doesn't in fact seem too sympathetic. She additionally doesn't mention any main points of severance unless they have been edited out of the video.

In the remark section, Tommy confirms that the video is in fact a couple of months previous. "I've been out of work for 7 months now and have no health insurance. Baby was born happy and healthy in August," he wrote.

That said, since he were given the boot, he was once unable to secure employment.

Article continues under advertisement

TikTok users who watched the video felt for Tommy, believing that him telling his boss that his girlfriend was pregnant associated with his termination.

"Pregnancy and firings go hand in hand," wrote one consumer. Others claimed it was a crimson flag that his boss explicitly discussed that his termination used to be not related to his pregnancy information.

Many had been still confused over whether he used to be laid off or fired.

Article continues under commercial

One TikTok consumer claimed that Tommy will have to be sure his company phrased it as a layoff in documentation. However, different customers responded to that comment claiming that they had been laid off, but never received documentation confirming it.

This is essential because the eligibility standards for unemployment benefits range from state to state, but typically, staff who're laid off are more likely to obtain more benefits than those that are fired for motive.

Article continues beneath advertisement

Although Tommy was now not the one pregnant, it kind of feels that his boss may have concept that he would take paternity go away when his girlfriend gave delivery. While discriminating in opposition to a pregnant worker is illegal, the same will not be true for the partner of a pregnant employee.

Despite this, many employers seem to have unethical practices in place that target those who are pregnant or the partners of those who are pregnant.

Elsewhere, one lady was once fired after coming back from her maternity go away, proving that being pregnant does put jobs at the line.

In a scenario very similar to Tommy's a girl was fired shortly after she returned from her maternity depart. Her boss if truth be told took to Reddit to ask others if he used to be incorrect for terminating her.

In his publish, he explained that his workforce was once finishing a undertaking when a pregnant worker, whom he referred to as Jess, went on go away. The staff started a brand new venture whilst she was long past, and so they needed to adapt to working without her expertise.

Article continues below commercial

The workforce sooner or later evolved the abilities needed to do a little of Jess's workload, but the company still hired a brand new worker to help out. The new worker was once significantly inexpensive as a result of he was recent out of school.

When Jess returned from depart, upper control informed her boss they could not find the money for to stay each Jess and the new hire on personnel. That mentioned, he had to choose between her and the less expensive new hire.

He chose the brand new hire, and Jess known as him a "c---" and left.

Most users who learn the submit had been outraged for Jess, and some agreed that she has a case towards her earlier employer for administrative center discrimination, depending on local labor regulations.

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pbXSramam6Ses7p6wqikaKhfoq6vecWiqZ6cXZaztbHRZqqhmaKeu6h5xqKppZ6inrKvsIypqZ6fnpa7tQ%3D%3D